|
Supporting History
Picking Applicants: A How-To Guide for Nonprofits and Private Organizations
August, 2001
Staff at the State Historical Fund are often asked who would be the
best applicant for a particular grant-funded project. It's a valid
question, especially from not-for-profits, private individuals, and
for-profit organizations.
The enabling law that guides administration of the State Historical
Fund requires that grants be made "primarily to public entities."
The term "public entities" is defined in state law as "
. . . the state, county, city and county, incorporated city or town,
school district, special improvement district, agency, instrumentality,
or political subdivision of the state organized pursuant to law."
The Colorado Historical Society's Board of Directors has interpreted
this provision to require that more than 50% of all grants must be
awarded to public entities. Note that not-for-profit organizations
are not included in this definition.
The enabling law goes on to say that grants may be made to other entities
such as not-for-profit organizations, but only if they apply "through"
a public entity. Fund regulations explain that this requirement can
be met by obtaining a signature from the local government authority
in the area where the project will occur. The Board has also, through
policy, decided that grants will not be made directly to private individuals
or for-profit organizations. This policy strengthens the legislative
intent that every grant should benefit the general public.
When the not-for-profit organization is carrying out its own project,
it may choose to be the grant applicant, or it may seek out a like-minded
public entity willing to become the applicant for their grant. The
public entity as an applicant will have a better chance of being funded,
due to the statutory language cited above. However, the public entity
"edge" should not be over-emphasized. In any one grant round,
it may be the difference between competing for 51% instead of 49%
of the available funding. If the not-for-profit organization has been
around for awhile and has experience in carrying out projects of this
kind, there is no need to look for a public entity applicant. If,
however, the not-for-profit is inexperienced, or if its mission is
not related to historic preservation, then a public entity applicant
might help. And remember that if the not-for-profit organization decides
to be the grant applicant, they will still need to get a signature
from the local government on their application. This signature should
not be confused with having the public entity actually become the
grant applicant. It carries no legal or financial obligation. It simply
tells the Fund that the local government is familiar with the project
and believes that it will have public benefit.
This leaves us with projects that will be carried out by private individuals
or for-profit organizations. In these cases, the individual or organization
is required to find a public entity or not-for-profit organization
to apply for the grant on their behalf, and to administer the grant
if their application is successful. This is not just a matter of finding
someone to sign the application. The successful grant applicant will
ultimately be required to sign the grant contract. They will become
legally and financially responsible for seeing that the project is
carried out successfully. In the event that something goes wrong,
they may be called upon to return funds to the grants program. To
protect their interests, they may (and should) require that the private
individual or for-profit organization indemnify them in some way.
Because public entities enjoy a preference in this program, they should
be the first point of contact when private individuals are looking
for someone to be their grant applicant. When the local government
comes forward with a grant application for a project, the Fund knows
that this public entity has chosen this particular project from all
of the possible projects in that community. This tells us that the
project will have public benefit.
Though many public entities gladly take on the responsibilities for
applying for and administering grants for private individuals or for-profit
organizations, some refuse for various reasons. They may be limited
from doing so by spending or revenue limitations. Or they may simply
have a policy against supporting one for-profit project in competition
against others in their community. In such cases, a not-for-profit
organization is the only option.
When identifying a not-for-profit organization to be the grant applicant
for a private individual or for-profit project, review that organization's
mission statement. The best fit will generally be with a local historical
society or historic preservation organization. They may have some
previous experience dealing with the State Historical Fund, and their
mission will typically run parallel to ours. In the absence of such
an organization, consider a not-for-profit whose mission deals with
the same issues that the project is likely to address. For example,
a loft project that includes below-market-rate units for low-income
individuals might apply through a local housing organization. A retail
project might apply through the local Chamber of Commerce or Main
Street organization. There might also be a not-for-profit that focuses
on a particular part of town, like Capitol Hill United Neighborhoods,
Inc., in Denver.
When shopping for a grant applicant, remember that you're asking them
a very big favor. They may charge for that responsibility, perhaps
based on the amount of the grant obtained. The Fund generally expects
those charges to be paid by the private individual or for-profit organization
as part of their cash match.
Some private individuals, hoping to avoid the necessity of forming
partnerships, have suggested setting up their own nonprofits just
for the purpose of applying for grants from the Fund. That action
is not likely to be successful. When reviewing grant applications,
new organizations with no track record, or organizations created to
carry out a single project, are not likely to compete well. And anyone
seeking to avoid partnering with logical public and not-for-profit
entities is unlikely to obtain the Fund's support.
For more information on the grant application process, contact our
Technical Advisors, Lyle Miller at 303/866-2779, or Rachel Yank at
303/866-3493.
BY MARK WOLFE, Director, State Historical
Fund
|